3/20/2021 0 Comments 1Password 4.2.2
Have your data analyzed and view the statistics and graphing report.
1Password 4.2.2 Software Is SuitableThis PC software is suitable for 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Windows XPVista7810.The most popular versions among the program users are 2.0, 1.5 and 1.4.The program lies within Development Tools, more precisely Database Tools.It enables you to perform basic statistical analysis and graphing of data, including creating and grouping variables (data management). It also updates data with new fields, changes the fields format(more decimals) and controls data. Continue this thread View entire discussion ( 152 comments) More posts from the linux community Continue browsing in rlinux rlinux All things Linux and GNULinux -- this is neither a community exclusively about the kernel Linux, nor is exclusively about the GNU operating system. 563k Members 1.6k Online Created Jan 25, 2008 Join help Reddit App Reddit coins Reddit premium Reddit gifts about careers press advertise blog Terms Content policy Privacy policy Mod policy Reddit Inc 2020. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts Log in sign up User account menu 632 PSA, Logitech has removed Hardware H.264 Encoder from some WebCams. When attempting to set up a remote streaming solution, i shocked to find that the newer ones no longer have hardware H.264 encoder. This is the official Logitech wbepage declaring the removal of this feature from C920, C922 and BRIO models: SAY GOODBYE TO IN-CAMERA HARDWARE ENCODING For comparison, below are the output from my v4l2-ctl, which shows the camera having only 2 pixel formats: RAW (YCbCr 4:2:2) and MJPEG v4l2-ctl --info --list-formats. It showed 3 formats: RAW (YCbCr 4:2:2), H.264 and MJPEG v4l2-ctl --list-formats. Those instructions would not work with the newer versions of this WebCam. I understand the logic for the average consumer not needingwanting onboard x264 encoding anymore. But dropping the feature keeping the name is just misleading. Continue this thread level 2 3 points 6 months ago I hate when companies do stuff like this And honestly Im surprised there hasnt been some kind of law against it to protect consumers. I dont use a webcam (or ever forsee myself using one.) but just the way logitech claims theyre basically DOING YOU A FAVOR by removing such a thing is infuriating. YOURE WELCOME They act like We freed up resources by no longer offering hardware encording so now we can focus on blah-blah-blah - bitch, thats not how hardware works. EDIT: The argument that software encoding is of a higher quality than hardware is irrelevant given that you have the option of using it or not. It would be necessary for backward compatibility for their webcams to do hardware encoding when connected via USB 2.0. If they threw away backward compatibility, then their webcams ought to now require USB 3.0. As for doing us a favor, the image quality of hardware encoders is never as good as software encoders, so as long as your machine can do it in software, then you would better off. If it is the case that there is no backward compatibility with USB 2.0 (since USB 2.0 would require a hardware encoder), this is certainly lousy for those whose machines cannot do hardware encoding (and are not fast enough for software encoding). It would also be lousy for the machines that are USB 2.0 only. Edit: I had not noticed the MJPEG support at a glance. Maybe that would allow them to keep USB 2.0 compatibility. This would definitely lower the BOM cost as there should be no royalties for MJPEG. It also would mean anything using USB 2.0 will have even worse image quality.: Continue this thread level 2 10 points 6 months ago Probably because most sold (windows) computers nowdays all have build in hardware encoder with iGPU and dedicated GPU, probably even at a better quality then the webcam had. Continue this thread level 2 1 point 6 months ago I dont use a webcam (or ever forsee myself using one.) Remote work is sort of the holy grail for a lot of tech workers, and youll need a webcam for meetings. Sure, your company-provided laptop will have one, but what if you prefer to use your own hardware for work Some companies, like mine, allow developers to use personal hardware for work. Continue this thread level 2 6 points 6 months ago Its an obsolete feature that saves them something like 12webcam based on back-of-the-napkin math, everyone has USB-3 now and the software encoders are just better these days. The people buying new webcams to use with RasPis 3s or other potatoes might be a little upset, but meanwhile basically nobody else should care. Even the Pi4 has sufficient hardware and performance these days.) Continue this thread level 1 42 points 6 months ago The whole point of trademark law is that it protects consumers by ensuring they get what they think they are getting and can base their decisions on the reputation of the company. ![]() Other examples of brokenness include when a company is able to buy a classic trademark and start producing cheap shit under that name. This is a legal bait-and-switch and it should be considered fraud. Trademark law needs to be reformed to properly protect the consumer. They should have renamed the camera model since they changed the hardware inside it. ![]() Members 1.6k Online Created Jan 25, 2008 Join help Reddit App Reddit coins Reddit premium Reddit gifts about careers press advertise blog Terms Content policy Privacy policy Mod policy Reddit Inc 2020.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |